M&K Holdings v. Samsung
By EsqSocial Corporation 26/02/21
Samsung sought inter partes review of M&K’s U.S. Patent No. 9,113,163. The Board held all claims unpatentable. M&K appealed, arguing that the Board erred by relying on references that do not qualify as prior art printed publications under 35 U.S.C. § 102. In addition, M&K argued that the Board erred by finding claim 3 anticipated when the petition for inter partes review asserted only obviousness as to that claim. The Court affirmed the Board’s decision with respect to the printed-publication...
By: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.